A great. § 16-17-2, since the both the defendants, such as-county loan providers, weren’t similarly based with no-of-county banking companies designated inside O
(Code 1981, §16-17-dos, passed by the Ga. L. 2004, p. sixty, § 3; Ga. L. 2005, p. sixty, § 16/HB 95; Ga. L. 2020, p. 156, § 9/SB 462.)
– Demonstration court didn’t err during the rejecting both the defendants’ equivalent shelter and you can vagueness demands to help you O.C.Grams.An excellent. § 16-17-1 et seq., pursuing the defendants was in fact faced with violating O.C.G.C.G.A good.